Whitney Osuigwe vs Chloe Paquet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 10:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Osuigwe vs C. Paquet

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Osuigwe 1 - 0 Paquet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Whitney Osuigwe winning 2 and Chloe Paquet winning 0. The last match between Whitney Osuigwe and Chloe Paquet was at the WTA 125 Jinan Open - Jinan, 13-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Whitney Osuigwe getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Osuigwe | 1 |
| Paquet | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) WTA 125 Jinan Open - Jinan(10-13-25)
W. Osuigwe vs C. Paquet H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $205,738 | Career Prize Money | $452,820 |
| 52.93% (217-193) | Career Total W/L | 50.59% (429-419) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 20.00% (1-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-6) |
W. Osuigwe vs C. Paquet Match Preview:
- When examining second serve performance over the last six months, Chloe Paquet leads slightly with 40.83% of points won compared to Whitney Osuigwe's 38.46%.
- In recent return game statistics, Chloe Paquet also has a minor edge, winning 53.29% of her opponent's second serve points, while Whitney Osuigwe has won 51.93%.
- How do they fare with first serve returns in recent form? Whitney Osuigwe leads with a rate of 36.11% over Chloe Paquet’s 35.31%.
- Considering performance under pressure, Chloe Paquet again appears stronger, saving 50.49% of breakpoints versus Osuigwe's 45.27%.
- Osuigwe, however, boasts a higher win rate in the past year, triumphing in 66.67% of matches, whereas Paquet has won just 38.18%.
- On clay, both show identical success at 60%, but Paquet performs better overall on grass at 35% compared to Osuigwe's 22%.
- Both players participate mainly in Challengers/ITF, but Osuigwe wins 71.01% of these matches, outperforming Paquet’s 52.63%.
- Could the level of opponents faced make a difference? Paquet encounters tougher competition, as reflected by an average opponent rank of 174.15, compared to Osuigwe’s 301.13.
- In deciding sets, Osuigwe excels with a 65% victory rate, significantly higher than Paquet's 26%.
- Analyzing event-specific performance can be crucial, though current event stats were not provided.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
The comparative analysis highlights Chloe Paquet’s stronger second serve and return game performance, which might give her a slight initial edge. Yet, Osuigwe's higher overall win rate in the past year suggests she is generally more consistent in securing matches.
Osuigwe’s significant lead in deciding set victories may prove pivotal if the match is tightly contested. Paquet faces tougher competition, which might explain her closer match stats despite lower win rates.
Considering the balance of factors, Whitney Osuigwe's consistency and strength in decisive moments position her as the likely victor in this matchup.
Whitney Osuigwe vs Chloe Paquet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Osuigwe vs C. Paquet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:50:10 | Average Match Time | 1:50:10 |
| 72% (53/74) | 1st Serve % | 56% (29/52) |
| 64% (34/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 48% (25/52) | Return Points Win % | 41% (30/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Osuigwe Recent Matches Played
C. Paquet Recent Matches Played

W. Osuigwe vs C. Paquet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.93% (217/193) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.59% (429/419) |
| 52.52% (489/442) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.40% (1012/957) |
| 51.12% (4346/4155) | Games Win/Loss | 50.98% (9239/8885) |
| 48.97% (95/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.83% (99/108) |
| 60.11% (110/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.63% (250/225) |
| 41.67% (10/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.66% (74/75) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.29% (6/11) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 353 | Aces Total | 2057 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1705 | Total Double Faults | 2941 |
| 1:32:28 | Average Match Time | 1:14:17 |
| 416.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.03 |
| 69% (17890/25752) | 1st Serve % | 59% (25227/42536) |
| 58% (10393/17890) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (16161/25227) |
| 42% (3274/7862) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7660/17309) |
| 48% (1583/3314) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2284/5057) |
| 47% (11821/25223) | Return Points Win % | 44% (19107/43126) |
| 30.77% (8/18) | Slam W/L | 29.27% (12/29) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Masters W/L | 15.38% (2/11) |
| 22.22% (4/14) | Main Tour W/L | 41.67% (45/63) |
| 55.86% (181/143) | Challenger W/L | 53.19% (275/242) |
| 72.00% (18/7) | Futures W/L | 56.21% (95/74) |
| 54% (213/395) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (424/836) |
| 0% (0/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 59% (49/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (91/183) |
| 54% (64/118) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (119/273) |
| 86% (211/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (455/366) |
| 14% (211/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (455/88) |
| 18% (198/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (393/61) |